DocumentCode
3185944
Title
Simulation versus embodied agents: Does either induce better human adherence to physical therapy exercise?
Author
Brooks, David ; Yu-Ping Chen ; Howard, Ayanna M.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Georgia Inst. of Technol., Atlanta, GA, USA
fYear
2012
fDate
24-27 June 2012
Firstpage
1715
Lastpage
1720
Abstract
This research investigates proper movement correlation as well as the overall perception of human subjects´ interaction with a simulated agent and an embodied agent in a physical therapeutic scenario. Using computer vision techniques coupled with the Microsoft Kinect to quantify reaching kinematics, correlation was assessed by aliging movements with a Vicon Motion Capture System as well as determining how well the specific exercises were mimicked. The results indicate that this approach is a viable alternative to Motion Capturing Systems for assessing certain movements during therapy. The results also indicate that there is some dependence on the use of an embodied agent as opposed to a simulated agent when assessing adherence.
Keywords
computer vision; patient treatment; Microsoft Kinect; computer vision techniques; embodied agents; human adherence; motion capturing systems; physical therapy exercise; proper movement correlation; simulated agent; vicon motion capture system; Cameras; Computer vision; Humans; Image segmentation; Kinematics; Measurement;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on
Conference_Location
Rome
ISSN
2155-1774
Print_ISBN
978-1-4577-1199-2
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290714
Filename
6290714
Link To Document