DocumentCode :
32153
Title :
Giving Meaning to RFID and Cochlear Implants
Author :
Wagemakers, Sandra ; Van Zoonen, Liesbet ; Turner, Greg
Author_Institution :
Tilburg Univ., Tilburg, Netherlands
Volume :
33
Issue :
2
fYear :
2014
fDate :
Summer 2014
Firstpage :
73
Lastpage :
80
Abstract :
In this article, we focus on people such as Randall and Edith; people who have either a cochlear implant for hearing improvement or a RFID implant. Both types of implants have caused controversy. The main opposition to CIs comes from the deaf community itself, which with the capital D signifies this minority culture. Deaf people consider themselves a socio-linguistic minority culture with sign language as their language [1]. They argue that CI undervalues the identity of being deaf: there is nothing wrong with being deaf, they are not disabled, and they do not need to be fixed. Controversies about RFID implants are more diverse and come from different groups: they include medical issues [2], [3], worries about physical assault [4], issues with privacy and the security of the collected data [3]-[7], a fear for dehumanization [3], and worries from Christians who consider the tag to be the “Mark of the Beast” as described in the book of Revelation [8].
Keywords :
cochlear implants; radiofrequency identification; CI; RFID implant; cochlear implant; collected data security; deaf community; dehumanization; hearing improvement; medical issues; physical assault; privacy; sign language; socio-linguistic minority culture; Auditory system; Cochlear implants; Radiofrequency identification; Security; Wearable computers;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0278-0097
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/MTS.2014.2319978
Filename :
6824315
Link To Document :
بازگشت