• DocumentCode
    327673
  • Title

    Experimental evaluation of two criteria for pattern comparison and alignment

  • Author

    Shekhar, C. ; Chellappa, R.

  • Author_Institution
    Center for Autom. Res., Maryland Univ., College Park, MD, USA
  • Volume
    1
  • fYear
    1998
  • fDate
    16-20 Aug 1998
  • Firstpage
    146
  • Abstract
    Pattern comparison and pattern alignment are related tasks. The former requires the use of a similarity measure for discriminating between patterns of different classes, while the latter requires a measure of the degree of alignment of two similar patterns. This paper presents an experimental evaluation of two promising measures, Fourier phase correlation and mutual information, which can be used for quantifying the similarity as well as the degree of alignment of two patterns. It is shown that these measures are quite stable to a range of pattern intensity variations, while exhibiting gradual monotonic decrease in the presence of geometric transformations. Phase correlation is more resistant to pattern noise and interference, whereas mutual information is more resistant to intensity variations and geometric distortions
  • Keywords
    Fourier analysis; correlation methods; pattern recognition; Fourier phase correlation; geometric distortions; geometric transformations; interference; mutual information; pattern alignment; pattern comparison; pattern intensity variations; pattern noise; similarity measure; Acoustic noise; Automation; Distortion measurement; Educational institutions; Interference; Mutual information; Phase distortion; Phase measurement; Phase noise; Sensor fusion;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Pattern Recognition, 1998. Proceedings. Fourteenth International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Brisbane, Qld.
  • ISSN
    1051-4651
  • Print_ISBN
    0-8186-8512-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICPR.1998.711101
  • Filename
    711101