Title :
On partial observability in discrete event control with pushdown systems
Author_Institution :
Appl. Res. Lab., Penn State Univ., State College, PA, USA
fDate :
June 30 2010-July 2 2010
Abstract :
Consider an event alphabet Σ. The Supervisory Control Theory of Ramadge and Wonham asks the question, given a plant model G, with language ℒM(G) ⊆ Σ* and another language K ⊆ ℒM(G), is there a supervisor φ such that ℒM(φ/G) = K. This question is complicated when the output of G is partially masked by M, which sends some events to the empty string ∈. This leads to the notion of the observability of K with respect to L and the mask M. We have K is observable with respect to L and M if for all s; t ∈ K̅ if sσ ∈ K̅ and M(s) = M(t) and tσ ∈ L̅, then tσ ∈ K̅. The property of observability can be related to a much stronger property normality, which is easily decidable when G has a finite number of states and K is also generated by a finite state machine.class of languages generated by pushdown automata properly includes the regular languages. They are accepted by finite state machines coupled with pushdown stack memory. This makes them interesting candidates as supervisory languages, since the supervisor will have non-finite memory. In this paper, we show the following: there is a property we call Property P that is (i) independent of Normality (Property N), (ii) implies observability, (iii) is decidable when K is accepted by a deterministic pushdown machine and G is a finite state machine and (iv) is preserved under union and hence there is a supremal sublanguage for which Property P holds for any K.
Keywords :
discrete event systems; finite state machines; observability; pushdown automata; discrete event control; finite state machine; nonfinite memory; partial observability; pushdown automata; pushdown machine; pushdown stack memory; pushdown system; supervisory control theory; supervisory languages; supremal sublanguage; Automata; Automatic control; Control systems; Educational institutions; Laboratories; Observability; Optimal control; Personal digital assistants; Petri nets; Supervisory control;
Conference_Titel :
American Control Conference (ACC), 2010
Conference_Location :
Baltimore, MD
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-7426-4
DOI :
10.1109/ACC.2010.5530531