DocumentCode
3302267
Title
Critical comparison of robust load flow methods for ill-conditioned systems
Author
Gutierrez, Jorge F. ; Bedrinana, Manfred F. ; Castro, Carlos A.
Author_Institution
Electr. Eng., UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil
fYear
2011
fDate
19-23 June 2011
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
6
Abstract
In this work, the performances of robust load flow methods are compared, in special when applied to ill-conditioned systems. In such cases, the iterative process may diverge or oscillate when standard Newton Raphson (SNR) based load flow calculation methods are used. Some known approaches to solve these systems are the Load Flow with Step Size Optimization (LFSSO) and Continuation Power Flow (CPF). Also, the Continuous Newton Power Flow (CNPF) method was proposed recently as a novel approach to solve ill-conditioned systems. Even though the performances of these methods have been reported in several sources, a critical comparison of the convergence characteristics and results for ill-conditioned systems are presented in this work. A modified version of the CNPF is also tested in order to improve its robustness. Simulation results for some IEEE test cases and realistic systems are shown to validate the analysis.
Keywords
Newton-Raphson method; load flow; optimisation; power system management; power system planning; CNPF; Ill-conditioned systems; continuation power flow; continuous Newton Raphson method; iterative process; load flow with step size optimization; robust load flow method; Jacobian matrices; Load flow; Loading; Optimization; Reactive power; Robustness; Signal to noise ratio; Load flow analysis; continuous Newton method; ill-conditioned systems; step size optimization;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
PowerTech, 2011 IEEE Trondheim
Conference_Location
Trondheim
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-8419-5
Electronic_ISBN
978-1-4244-8417-1
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/PTC.2011.6019405
Filename
6019405
Link To Document