• DocumentCode
    3332521
  • Title

    Weibayes testing: What is the impact if assumed beta is incorrect?

  • Author

    Nicholls, David ; Lein, Paul

  • Author_Institution
    Reliability Inf. Anal. Center (RIAC), Quanterion Solutions Inc., Utica, NY
  • fYear
    2009
  • fDate
    26-29 Jan. 2009
  • Firstpage
    37
  • Lastpage
    42
  • Abstract
    This paper evaluates Weibayes small sample, zero and sudden death failure test and data analysis techniques in order to mathematically and graphically quantify the risk associated with assuming an incorrect value of the Weibull shape parameter, beta (beta). Specifically, the risk associated with assuming a value of beta that is higher than the ldquotruerdquo value of beta is investigated, as this is the scenario that can cause users of the Weibayes approach to (1) understate the test time needed to correctly define a reliability requirement and (2) interpret the test results incorrectly and overstate the reliability actually demonstrated. The work product of this effort is a MS Excelreg spreadsheet that automates the process of quantifying the risk associated with the Weibayes approach.
  • Keywords
    data analysis; failure analysis; reliability; statistical analysis; Weibayes testing; Weibull shape parameter; beta intersection point; cumulative distribution function; data analysis; reliability requirement; sudden death failure test; Constraint optimization; Data analysis; Data engineering; Design optimization; Failure analysis; Information analysis; Knowledge engineering; Life testing; Risk analysis; Shape;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2009. RAMS 2009. Annual
  • Conference_Location
    Fort Worth, TX
  • ISSN
    0149-144X
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-2508-2
  • Electronic_ISBN
    0149-144X
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/RAMS.2009.4914646
  • Filename
    4914646