• DocumentCode
    3333057
  • Title

    Comparison of loss formulas for a circuit group with overflow traffic

  • Author

    Park, Chul Geun ; Ryu, Seok-Yul

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Inf. & Commun. Eng., Sunmoon Univ., Asan, South Korea
  • fYear
    2011
  • fDate
    2-5 Oct. 2011
  • Firstpage
    422
  • Lastpage
    427
  • Abstract
    Many articles have dealt with the loss formulas for determining the required number of circuits in a transit circuit group with overflow traffic. Traditionally, ERM (Equivalent Random Method) is used to determine number of circuits in a final circuit group with rough overflow traffic which has vmr (variance to mean ratio) greater than one. Recently, IPP (Interrupted Poisson Process) approximate method which represents the collective feature of the overflow have been introduced. The negative binomial loss formula can be applied to determine the required number of circuits. In this paper, we deal with the negative binomial loss formula and determination method of number of circuits. We also analyze and compare these three loss formulas. To apply these formulas to the capacity planning of circuit networks, we need more effective algorithm for the accurate numerical calculation.
  • Keywords
    stochastic processes; telecommunication network planning; telecommunication traffic; IPP; capacity planning; circuit group; equivalent random method; interrupted Poisson process; loss formulas comparison; negative binomial loss formula; overflow traffic; Equations; Generators; Integrated circuit modeling; Linear systems; Mathematical model; Probability; Steady-state; ERM; IPP; Loss formulas; Overflow traffic; Pascal;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Communications (APCC), 2011 17th Asia-Pacific Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Sabah
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4577-0389-8
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/APCC.2011.6152846
  • Filename
    6152846