Title :
Automatic keratoconus detection by means of a neural network: comparison between a monocular and a binocular approach
Author :
Perissutti, P. ; Accardo, A.P. ; Pensiero, S. ; Salvetat, M.L.
Author_Institution :
Ist. per l´´Infanzia, U.O. Di Oculistica, Trieste, Italy
fDate :
29 Oct-1 Nov 1998
Abstract :
The results of the utilisation of neural networks for the automatic identification of keratoconus from corneal maps, using 9 previously selected objective parameters, were compared. The keratoconus is an asymmetrical pathology, sometimes monolateral, while the maps of normal eyes and of congenital astigmatism are more often symmetrical. So we compared two methods, the first (monocular) in which each eye is considered alone and the second (binocular) in which information from both eyes of the same subject are the input of the neural network. The binocular information could in fact improve the ability of the neural network to identify the keratoconus corneotopographic patterns. The comparison of the results obtained with the two approaches does not show a significant difference: a sensitivity of 92% in both cases and a specificity of 99% and 100% respectively were obtained. Therefore the two methods must be considered equivalent
Keywords :
backpropagation; eye; medical diagnostic computing; medical expert systems; neural nets; pattern classification; asymmetrical pathology; automatic identification; automatic keratoconus detection; backpropagation; binocular approach; corneal maps; corneotopographic patterns; expert system; monocular approach; neural network; objective parameters; sensitivity; specificity; videokeratoscope; Analytical models; Cornea; Diagnostic expert systems; Expert systems; Eyes; Neural networks; Open systems; Pathology; Surface topography; Vision defects;
Conference_Titel :
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1998. Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
Conference_Location :
Hong Kong
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-5164-9
DOI :
10.1109/IEMBS.1998.747143