• DocumentCode
    3350178
  • Title

    Using structural modeling to guarantee timing consistency

  • Author

    Pistone, David R.

  • Author_Institution
    Intel Corp., Folsom, CA, USA
  • fYear
    1991
  • fDate
    23-27 Sep 1991
  • Lastpage
    38139
  • Abstract
    As device performances continue to improve, timing simulation becomes an ever-increasing requirement. Many devices available today, especially programmable ones, have inadequately or inconsistently specified timing parameters. Because cumulative timing delays in a structural model are simply a set of equations, these inconsistencies make it impossible to structurally model the device. A way to check for and identify these inconsistencies is needed. The answer is a simple step-by-step process which will guarantee consistency between timing parameters, thereby resulting in more accurate and realistic device timing specifications. The author discusses a method developed to solve the problems caused by inconsistent timing specifications while creating a structural device model. This method uses five steps to identify and correct, if feasible, any inconsistencies between timing specifications for a given device
  • Keywords
    application specific integrated circuits; circuit analysis computing; logic CAD; consistency between timing parameters; inconsistent timing specifications; step-by-step process; structural device model; structural modeling; timing simulation; timing specifications consistency; Cities and towns; Clocks; Design optimization; Differential equations; Macrocell networks; Production; Programmable logic devices; Propagation delay; Timing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    ASIC Conference and Exhibit, 1991. Proceedings., Fourth Annual IEEE International
  • Conference_Location
    Rochester, NY
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-0101-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ASIC.1991.242885
  • Filename
    242885