Title :
BaBar vs SuperB: Possible strategies for trigger implementations.
Author :
Branchini, P. ; Bocci, V. ; Aloisio, A.
Author_Institution :
INFN Sezione di Roma Tre, Rome, Italy
Abstract :
The SuperB flagship project has recently been approved by INFN director´s board. The experiment will be built on a e+e- collider which will deliver about 100 a-1 barn in 5 years with a peak luminosity in the range of 1036 cm-2s-1. Luminosity and trigger rates are 100 times higher than the ones achieved at PEP-II at SLAC for the Babar experiment. Exploiting the measured rates from Babar we can expect when running at 1036 cm-2s-1 : 50 kHz Bhabha, 25 kHz beam background, 25 kHz physics. The trigger must therefore cope with a maximum rate in the range of 150 kHz with an event size of the order of 75 kBytes. A maximum of 70 ns per event dead time is therefore tolerable in order to achieve a maximum event loss of about 1%. As in Babar the most important detectors taking part to the trigger decision will be the Drift Chamber and the electromagnetic calorimeter. This is a real challenge since both the Barrel Calorimeter (CsI Tl doped) and the Drift Chamber are rather slow detectors. In this presentation we review the Babar trigger architecture: its baseline design and the one presently envisaged for SuperB are compared, highlighting the improvements needed to fulfill the research program.
Keywords :
drift chambers; particle calorimetry; trigger circuits; Babar experiment; Babar trigger architecture; INFN director board; PEP-II; SLAC; SuperB flagship project; barrel calorimeter; baseline design; beam background; drift chamber; electromagnetic calorimeter; event dead time; event size; maximum event loss; positron+electron collider; research program; trigger decision; trigger implementations; trigger rates; Discrete cosine transforms;
Conference_Titel :
Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 2011 IEEE
Conference_Location :
Valencia
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4673-0118-3
DOI :
10.1109/NSSMIC.2011.6154573