• DocumentCode
    3368250
  • Title

    Text, Table and Graph -- Which is Faster and More Accurate to Understand?

  • Author

    Prasad, Gollapudi V R J Sai ; Ojha, Amitash

  • Author_Institution
    Cognitive Sci. Lab., IIIT-Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    18-20 July 2012
  • Firstpage
    126
  • Lastpage
    131
  • Abstract
    Today´s school and college textbooks are full of static, multimodal content. This research investigates which of the three modalities - text, table or graph - is more efficient in conveying a given message to students. For fixed content, we hypothesized that graph representation is better of the three for comprehension. Experiment results (N=25)suggest that graphs are indeed 25.5% faster to understand than text and 46.5% faster than tables. In terms of accuracy of responses, graphs were 13.5% worse than text and 8.6%more accurate than tables. When the ratio of amount of accurate answers for each second taken to respond was checked, graphs were faster as they enabled downloading of5.7% of the answer in one second time, whereas text downloaded only 3.6% and table only 3.9%. For our experimental data, it appears that graph mode might be faster but less accurate. However, when it comes to amount of correct comprehension, graph mode does come out better.
  • Keywords
    graph theory; text analysis; college textbooks; graph representation; multimodal content; school textbooks; static content; table; Accuracy; Atmospheric measurements; Companies; Particle measurements; Software; Time factors; Visualization; comprehension; graph; graphcomprehension; modes; multimodality; speed of understanding; table; text;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Technology for Education (T4E), 2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Hyderabad
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4673-2173-0
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/T4E.2012.18
  • Filename
    6305953