Impact of interoperability on CAD-IP reuse: an academic viewpoint

Mind-boggling complexity of EDA tools necessitates reuse of intellectual property in any large-scale commercial or academic operation. However, due to the nature of software, a tool component remains an ill-defined concept, in contrast to a hardware component (core) with its formally specified functions and interfaces. Furthermore, EDA tasks often evolve rapidly to fit new manufacturing contexts or new design approaches created by circuit designers; this leads to moving targets for CAD software developers. Yet, it is uneconomical to write off tool reuse as simply an endemic "software problem". Our main message is that CAD tools should be planned and designed in terms of reusable components and glue code. This implies that industrial and academic research should focus on (1) formulating practical tool components in terms of common interfaces, (2) implementing such components, and (3) performing detailed evaluations of such components. While this is reminiscent of hardware reuse, most existing EDA tools are designed as stand-alone programs and interface through files.