Title :
Accurate frequency comparisons at the 1×10-15 level
Author :
Parker, T.E. ; Howe, D.A. ; Weiss, M.
Author_Institution :
Time & Frequency Div., Nat. Inst. of Stand. & Technol., Boulder, CO, USA
Abstract :
Increased fractional frequency uncertainties in comparing two cesium-fountain primary frequency standards due to a long-baseline comparison process are examined. These include frequency uncertainties introduced by the time-transfer process and uncertainties introduced by possible long-term dead time in the fountain operation. Using common-view GPS it may take up to 40 days to reduce the time-transfer fractional frequency uncertainty to 1×10-15 A combination of common-view GPS and two-way satellite time and frequency transfer can reduce this to 24 days. With a very low noise local oscillator such as a cavity-tuned hydrogen maser, distributed fountain dead times as large as 87% can be present and yet contribute only an additional uncertainty of less than 3.3×10-16
Keywords :
Global Positioning System; atomic clocks; caesium; frequency stability; frequency standards; transfer standards; 24 d; Cs; Cs fountain primary frequency standards; cavity-tuned hydrogen maser; common-view GPS; distributed fountain dead times; fractional frequency uncertainties; frequency comparison; frequency transfer; local oscillator; long-baseline comparison; noise; time-transfer fractional frequency uncertainty; two-way satellite time transfer; Clocks; Frequency measurement; Global Positioning System; Local oscillators; Measurement standards; Noise figure; Noise level; Phase measurement; Phase noise; Time measurement;
Conference_Titel :
Frequency Control Symposium, 1998. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International
Conference_Location :
Pasadena, CA
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-4373-5
DOI :
10.1109/FREQ.1998.717915