DocumentCode :
3461192
Title :
Ultrasound image compression exploiting image formation models
Author :
Cramblitt, Robert M. ; Parker, Kevin J.
Author_Institution :
Center for Biomed. Ultrasound, Rochester Univ., NY, USA
Volume :
2
fYear :
1996
fDate :
3-6 Nov 1996
Firstpage :
1377
Abstract :
The diagnostic benefits of teleradiology may not be available in locations which lack high-bandwidth transmission channels. In these cases, data compression is required in order to use low bit-rate digital channels. Standard compression algorithms, such as JPEG, are not ideally suited to ultrasound images, in which speckle structure plays an important role. We have developed an algorithm for progressively encoding ultrasound images which incorporates knowledge of both the system parameters and the image formation process, and which preserves the speckle structure in the image. The algorithm operates on the digitized RF output of an ultrasound scanner and identifies pixels in the image giving rise to the largest output in a local neighborhood. It iteratively allocates point scatterers to these pixels and transmits their amplitudes and locations using Huffman encoding. The image is reconstructed by convolving an RF pulse with the received sparse scatterer matrix. We describe the basic algorithm and compare its performance, using rate-distortion curves, to the JPEG standard. Distortion is measured by both simple root-mean-squared (RMS) error and human visual system (HVS)-weighted RMS error. The HVS distortions are included to better account for the perceived differences in image quality seen by the diagnostician
Keywords :
Huffman codes; acoustic convolution; biomedical ultrasonics; data compression; error analysis; image coding; image reconstruction; medical image processing; speckle; ultrasonic scattering; Huffman encoding; JPEG standard; RF pulse; amplitudes; diagnostic benefits; diagnostician; digitized RF output; distortion; high-bandwidth transmission channels; human visual system weighted RMS error; image formation models; image quality; image reconstruction; locations; low bit-rate digital channels; perceived differences; pixels; point scatterers; progressive encoding; rate-distortion curves; received sparse scatterer matrix; simple root-mean-squared error; speckle structure; system parameters; teleradiology; ultrasound image compression; Compression algorithms; Data compression; Image coding; Iterative algorithms; Radio frequency; Radiofrequency identification; Scattering; Speckle; Transform coding; Ultrasonic imaging;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Ultrasonics Symposium, 1996. Proceedings., 1996 IEEE
Conference_Location :
San Antonio, TX
ISSN :
1051-0117
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-3615-1
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ULTSYM.1996.584302
Filename :
584302
Link To Document :
بازگشت