DocumentCode :
34651
Title :
Implementation of Artifact Detection in Critical Care: A Methodological Review
Author :
Nizami, S. ; Green, James R. ; McGregor, Carolyn
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Syst. & Comput. Eng., Carleton Univ., Ottawa, ON, Canada
Volume :
6
fYear :
2013
fDate :
2013
Firstpage :
127
Lastpage :
142
Abstract :
Artifact detection (AD) techniques minimize the impact of artifacts on physiologic data acquired in critical care units (CCU) by assessing quality of data prior to clinical event detection (CED) and parameter derivation (PD). This methodological review introduces unique taxonomies to synthesize over 80 AD algorithms based on these six themes: 1) CCU; 2) physiologic data source; 3) harvested data; 4) data analysis; 5) clinical evaluation; and 6) clinical implementation. Review results show that most published algorithms: a) are designed for one specific type of CCU; b) are validated on data harvested only from one OEM monitor; c) generate signal quality indicators (SQI) that are not yet formalized for useful integration in clinical workflows; d) operate either in standalone mode or coupled with CED or PD applications; e) are rarely evaluated in real-time; and f) are not implemented in clinical practice. In conclusion, it is recommended that AD algorithms conform to generic input and output interfaces with commonly defined data: 1) type; 2) frequency; 3) length; and 4) SQIs. This shall promote: a) reusability of algorithms across different CCU domains; b) evaluation on different OEM monitor data; c) fair comparison through formalized SQIs; d) meaningful integration with other AD, CED and PD algorithms; and e) real-time implementation in clinical workflows.
Keywords :
biomedical engineering; data acquisition; data analysis; reviews; AD algorithm; CCU domains; CED algorithm; OEM monitor data; PD algorithms; SQI; artifact detection techniques; clinical evaluation; clinical event detection; clinical implementation; clinical workflows; critical care units; data analysis; data harvesting; data quality assessment; frequency; input interfaces; length; methodological review; output interfaces; parameter derivation; physiologic data source; real-time implementation; signal quality indicators; taxonomies; Algorithm design and analysis; Biomedical monitoring; Electrocardiography; Feature extraction; Monitoring; Real-time systems; Algorithms; Artifacts; Biomedical Engineering; Critical Care; Humans; Medical Informatics Applications; Monitoring, Physiologic; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Reviews in
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
1937-3333
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/RBME.2013.2243724
Filename :
6423795
Link To Document :
بازگشت