• DocumentCode
    3481675
  • Title

    Strengths and weaknesses of the external examiner mechanism

  • Author

    Clements, Alan

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Comput., Teesside Univ., Middlesbrough
  • fYear
    2005
  • fDate
    19-22 Oct. 2005
  • Lastpage
    19
  • Abstract
    There are many differences between British and US universities. Nowhere is the difference greater than in the way in which students are assessed. US professors have considerable autonomy in how they set and grade an exam. UK universities implement a complex process that interlocks universities to create a common procedural standard across the country. A UK academic sets an exam and produces specimen solutions plus a marking scheme that are sent to a senior academic, the external examiner, in another university. The external examiner comments on the suitability of the exam and the teacher setting the exam should modify the paper if requested. When students take the exam, the external examiner samples their work and comments on the results. The external examiner is responsible for academic quality control. This paper describes the UK´s external examiner system and looks at the strengths and weaknesses of the mechanism and its influence on higher education in the UK
  • Keywords
    educational administrative data processing; educational institutions; further education; standards; British universities; US universities; academic quality control; academic standards; external examiner mechanism; higher education; Computer science education; Continuing education; Continuous improvement; Curriculum development; Government; Qualifications; Quality assurance; Quality control; Terminology; USA Councils; Higher education; academic standards; assessment; examinations;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Frontiers in Education, 2005. FIE '05. Proceedings 35th Annual Conference
  • Conference_Location
    Indianopolis, IN
  • ISSN
    0190-5848
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-9077-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/FIE.2005.1612048
  • Filename
    1612048