DocumentCode
3500932
Title
Design-patterning co-optimization of SRAM robustness for double patterning lithography
Author
Joshi, Vivek ; Agarwal, Kanak ; Sylvester, Dennis
Author_Institution
Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
fYear
2012
fDate
Jan. 30 2012-Feb. 2 2012
Firstpage
713
Lastpage
718
Abstract
Double patterning lithography (DPL) provides an attractive optical lithography solution for 32nm and subsequent technology nodes. There are two primary DPL techniques: pitch-split double patterning (PSDP) and self-aligned double patterning (SADP), which can be implemented using a positive tone or a negative tone process. Each DPL implementation has a different impact on line space and linewidth variation, and by analyzing the impact of these different DPL options the best overall process flow can be achieved. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis and optimization framework that compares the layerwise impact of different DPL choices on SRAM robustness, density, and printability. It then performs a sizing optimization that accounts for increased variability due to DPL for each layer. Experimental results based on 45nm industrial models show that using the best DPL option for each layer, along with the sizing optimization presented, we can achieve single exposure robustness together with improved DPL printability at almost no overhead (less than 0.2% increase in write energy). Specifically, cell failure probability can be further reduced by 5X as compared to the single exposure failure probability, at the cost of increasing write energy by 6.3% and write delay by 2.5%.
Keywords
SRAM chips; integrated circuit design; photolithography; probability; DPL technique; PSDP technique; SADP technique; SRAM density; SRAM printability; SRAM robustness; cell failure probability; design-patterning cooptimization; double-patterning lithography; industrial models; line space variation; linewidth variation; negative-tone process; optical lithography solution; pitch-split double patterning; positive-tone process; process flow; self-aligned double patterning; single-exposure failure probability; single-exposure robustness; size 32 nm; size 45 nm; sizing optimization; subsequent technology nodes; write delay; write energy; Capacitance; Delay; Layout; Logic gates; Metals; Random access memory; Robustness;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC), 2012 17th Asia and South Pacific
Conference_Location
Sydney, NSW
ISSN
2153-6961
Print_ISBN
978-1-4673-0770-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ASPDAC.2012.6165048
Filename
6165048
Link To Document