DocumentCode
3516278
Title
Integrating System and Software Engineering Through Modeling
Author
Mindock, Jennifer ; Watney, Garth
Author_Institution
Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Technol., Pasadena, CA
fYear
2008
fDate
1-8 March 2008
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
12
Abstract
System engineers who are responsible for capturing the formal requirements of a system typically have relied on text-based tools and free-form diagrams, otherwise known as "shall statements" and "PowerPoint engineering". In our work with the space interferometry mission (SIM) at NASA\´s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, we found the need to unambiguously represent behaviors and interfaces using common language and terminology across multiple project elements, for example, throughout different levels of system engineering and among system, software, and controls engineering. The system engineers adopted portions of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) [1] as a means to effectively communicate interfaces and desired system behaviors. UML sequence diagrams were used to capture scenarios and provide context for and understanding of the intent of the typical "shall statements". UML Statechart diagrams were used to capture dynamic behavior. In practice, the system and software engineers would iterate together on these models. Iterating on models proved to be a highly effective method of "fleshing-in" loosely worded and ambiguous requirements. Requirements have typically been difficult for the software engineer to implement without understanding the intent behind the requirements. Through the process of modeling, we found that system and software engineers effectively communicated interfaces and behavior. Modeling provided other benefits as well, notably, the ability to auto-generate portions of the flight code from these models and to apply formal methods to prove various correctness properties regarding the model. In this paper, we will describe in further detail how system engineers used modeling as an effective communication tool to capture requirements, their context, and the ensuing design throughout multiple levels of the system and within a subsystem. This increased software engineers\´ understanding of and insight into the system, making the software design process more e- fficient. In addition, we will describe how software engineers leveraged the models to improve the quality and reduce the cost of the final software product.
Keywords
Unified Modeling Language; aerospace computing; software engineering; PowerPoint engineering; Unified Modeling Language; formal requirements; free-form diagrams; shall statements; software engineering; space interferometry mission; system engineering; text-based tools; Aerospace engineering; Design engineering; Power engineering and energy; Power system modeling; Software engineering; Software quality; Software systems; Space missions; Systems engineering and theory; Unified modeling language;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Aerospace Conference, 2008 IEEE
Conference_Location
Big Sky, MT
ISSN
1095-323X
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-1487-1
Electronic_ISBN
1095-323X
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/AERO.2008.4526595
Filename
4526595
Link To Document