DocumentCode
3548896
Title
Open vs. Closed-Loop Control of the MEMS Electrostatic Comb Drive
Author
Borovic, B. ; Hong, C. ; Zhang, X.M. ; Liu, A.Q. ; Lewis, F.L.
Author_Institution
Automatics & Robotics Res. Inst., Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Fort Worth, TX
fYear
2005
fDate
27-29 June 2005
Firstpage
982
Lastpage
988
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to address the issue of driving the very small scale (1.5 times 1 mm) comb drive (actuator). Two approaches are available, input signal shaping approach that drives the comb drive in open loop, and a closed loop approach. Position is measured by optical sensor. We compare the two approaches using both experimental and simulation results. First, the description, model, and experimental setup of the actual device are given. It is followed by simple parameter identification. Input shaping open-loop techniques are addressed first. It is followed by closed-loop approach. Finally, the comparison between two approaches, sensitivity issues, and reflections on the design of the device itself are given
Keywords
closed loop systems; control system synthesis; electrostatic actuators; feedback; open loop systems; optical sensors; parameter estimation; position measurement; sensitivity; 1 mm; 1.5 mm; MEMS electrostatic comb drive actuator; closed-loop control; device design; feedback; input signal shaping; open loop control; optical sensor; parameter identification; position measurement; reflection; sensitivity; Blades; Capacitance; Electrostatics; Fingers; Micromechanical devices; Mirrors; Optical beams; Optical modulation; Robotics and automation; Voltage;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Intelligent Control, 2005. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on, Mediterrean Conference on Control and Automation
Conference_Location
Limassol
ISSN
2158-9860
Print_ISBN
0-7803-8936-0
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/.2005.1467147
Filename
1467147
Link To Document