Title :
Assessment of analysis techniques used in determining grounding system potential rise from the fall of potential method
Author :
Woodhouse, D.J. ; Middleton, R.H.
Author_Institution :
Energy Australia, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
Abstract :
The prevalent method used to determine the ground potential rise (GPR) of an earthing or grounding system is to perform a fall of potential (FOP) test undertaken during a grounding system current injection test. Determining the test GPR requires analysis of FOP test data due to the FOP response´s nonconservative asymptotic behaviour. This paper assesses achievable tolerance by FOP test analysis including recognised and alternative methods. Susceptibility to voltage and distance measurement noise is examined by application to a grounding system model to establish minimum error bounds and method estimation variation on GPR estimates. The applicability of the FOP test `rule of thumb´ termination condition, to take three to four readings beyond the `knee´ of the FOP response, is also examined. In particular, the question of whether appropriate information is gathered when this condition is met is discussed
Keywords :
earthing; electric impedance; voltage measurement; distance measurement noise susceptibility; earthing; fall of potential method; grounding system current injection test; grounding system potential rise; impedance; minimum error bounds; nonconservative asymptotic behaviour; rule of thumb termination condition; voltage susceptibility; Australia; Conductivity; Ground penetrating radar; Grounding; Impedance; Knee; Performance evaluation; Soil measurements; System testing; Voltage;
Conference_Titel :
Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 2000. IEEE
Conference_Location :
Seattle, WA
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-6420-1
DOI :
10.1109/PESS.2000.867542