Comparative analysis of scan compression techniques

Design for Testability (DFT) based on scan and ATPG has been adopted as a reliable and broadly acceptable methodology that provides very high test coverage, but for large circuits, the growing test data volume causes a significant increase in test cost because of much longer test time and elevated tester memory requirements. Test compression or scan compression provides great reduction in test data volume and test time required by adding on-chip decompressor and compactor. In this paper comparative analysis are made for Broadcast, XOR decompressor along with XOR, MISR and Hybrid compactors with respect to test coverage, test cycles required and test data volume by considering Flash Interface as CUT. From the experiments, it is observed that XOR decompressor with MISR compactor architecture provides 17.31% to 49.76% reduction in test data volume compared to other architectures, with 99.76% of fault coverage, 16694 test cycles and 2104μm² of area overhead.