DocumentCode
3590560
Title
Research in Evaluation Criteria of Evidence Combination
Author
Yang, Yang ; Cheng, Yongmei ; Liang, Yan ; Pan, Quan ; Wan, Wenjing
Author_Institution
Inst. of Autom., Northwestern Polytech. Univ., Xi´´an
Volume
1
fYear
0
Firstpage
2618
Lastpage
2622
Abstract
Processing conflict-evidence was realized by improving combination rules in evidence theory. Based on analyzing methods of evidence combination in detail, these methods often lost some good qualities when they improved some qualities, such as anti-high-conflict. It was necessary to evaluate all qualities of these methods. Anti-high-conflict was proposed, identity and polarization were perfected. These evaluation criteria were used to evaluate the validity of combination rules in solving low-conflict, high-conflict and other problems. According to qualitative and quantificational compare for six combination rules, the conclusions supply the foundation for constructing, evaluation and application these combination rules
Keywords
case-based reasoning; anti-high-conflict; combination rules; conflict-evidence processing; evaluation criteria; evidence theory; Automation; Intelligent control; Polarization; Combination rules; Evaluation criteria; Evidence theory;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Intelligent Control and Automation, 2006. WCICA 2006. The Sixth World Congress on
Print_ISBN
1-4244-0332-4
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/WCICA.2006.1712836
Filename
1712836
Link To Document