• DocumentCode
    3590560
  • Title

    Research in Evaluation Criteria of Evidence Combination

  • Author

    Yang, Yang ; Cheng, Yongmei ; Liang, Yan ; Pan, Quan ; Wan, Wenjing

  • Author_Institution
    Inst. of Autom., Northwestern Polytech. Univ., Xi´´an
  • Volume
    1
  • fYear
    0
  • Firstpage
    2618
  • Lastpage
    2622
  • Abstract
    Processing conflict-evidence was realized by improving combination rules in evidence theory. Based on analyzing methods of evidence combination in detail, these methods often lost some good qualities when they improved some qualities, such as anti-high-conflict. It was necessary to evaluate all qualities of these methods. Anti-high-conflict was proposed, identity and polarization were perfected. These evaluation criteria were used to evaluate the validity of combination rules in solving low-conflict, high-conflict and other problems. According to qualitative and quantificational compare for six combination rules, the conclusions supply the foundation for constructing, evaluation and application these combination rules
  • Keywords
    case-based reasoning; anti-high-conflict; combination rules; conflict-evidence processing; evaluation criteria; evidence theory; Automation; Intelligent control; Polarization; Combination rules; Evaluation criteria; Evidence theory;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Intelligent Control and Automation, 2006. WCICA 2006. The Sixth World Congress on
  • Print_ISBN
    1-4244-0332-4
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/WCICA.2006.1712836
  • Filename
    1712836