DocumentCode
36570
Title
Superresolution Land Cover Mapping Using Spatial Regularization
Author
Feng Ling ; Xiaodong Li ; Fei Xiao ; Yun Du
Author_Institution
Key Lab. of Monitoring & Estimate for Environ. & Disaster of Hubei Province, Inst. of Geodesy & Geophys., Wuhan, China
Volume
52
Issue
7
fYear
2014
fDate
Jul-14
Firstpage
4424
Lastpage
4439
Abstract
Superresolution mapping (SRM) is a method of predicting the spatial locations of land cover classes within mixed pixels in remotely sensed images. This paper proposes a novel SRM framework that is operated from the perspective of spatial regularization. Within the proposed framework, SRM aims to generate final superresolution land cover maps that conform to inputted fraction images, with spatial regularization intended for exploiting a priori knowledge about the land cover maps. Two SRM models are constructed by using maximal spatial dependence as the spatial regularization term and the L1 or L2 norm as the data fidelity term. The proposed models are evaluated by using synthetic Landsat, real IKONOS, and real Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer images and compared with hard classification technologies, as well as pixel-swapping, Hopfield neural network, and Markov random field SRM models. We perform linear spectral mixture analysis (LSMA) and multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis (MESMA) to estimate fraction images. Results show that the accuracy of inputted fraction images plays an important role in the final superresolution land cover maps and that using MESMA fraction images results in higher accuracy than using LSMA fraction images. Moreover, the L-curve criterion is suitable for choosing the optimal regularization parameter in both SRM models. Compared with hard classification technologies and other SRM models, the proposed model derives the highest Kappa coefficients and lowest class area proportion errors when MESMA fraction images are used as input.
Keywords
Markov processes; geophysical image processing; land cover; mixture models; neural nets; terrain mapping; vegetation mapping; Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer; Hopfield neural network SRM model; L-curve criterion; L1 norm; L2 norm; LSMA fraction images; MESMA fraction images; Markov random field SRM model; SRM framework; data fidelity term; fraction image estimation; hard classification technologies; land cover class; linear spectral mixture analysis; maximal spatial dependence; mixed pixels; multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis; pixel swapping technologies; real AVIRIS images; real IKONOS images; remotely sensed images; spatial location prediction; spatial regularization term; superresolution land cover mapping; superresolution land cover maps; synthetic Landsat images; Data models; Earth; Optimization; Remote sensing; Satellites; Spatial resolution; Spatial regularization; spectral unmixing; superresolution mapping (SRM);
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0196-2892
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TGRS.2013.2281992
Filename
6617693
Link To Document