Keynote Abstracts

Testing and verification problems in the software industry come in many different forms, due to significant differences across domains and contexts. But one common challenge is scalability, the capacity to test and verify increasingly large, complex systems. Another concern relates to practicality. Can the inputs required by a given technique be realistically provided by engineers? This talk reports on 10 years of research tackling verification and testing as a search and optimization problem, often but not always relying on abstractions and models of the system under test. Our observation is that most of the problems we faced could be re-expressed so as to make use of appropriate search and optimization techniques to automate a specific testing or verification strategy. One significant advantage of such an approach is that it often leads to solutions that scale in large problem spaces and that are less demanding in terms of the level of detail and precision required in models and abstractions. Their drawback, as heuristics, is that they are not amenable to proof and need to be thoroughly evaluated by empirical means. However, in the real world of software development, proof is usually not an option, even for smaller and critical systems. In practice, testing and verification is a means to reduce risk as much as possible given available resources and time. Concrete examples of problems we have addressed and that I will cover in my talk include schedulability analysis, stress/load testing, CPU usage analysis, robustness testing, testing closed-loop dynamic controllers, and SQL Injection testing. Most of these projects have been performed in industrial contexts and solutions were validated on industrial software. There are, however, many other examples in the literature, a growing research trend that has given rise to a new field of study named search-based software testing.