• DocumentCode
    3661057
  • Title

    Comparison of auto-encoders with different sparsity regularizers

  • Author

    Li Zhang; Yaping Lu

  • Author_Institution
    School of Computer Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu, China
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    7/1/2015 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    5
  • Abstract
    Generally, in order to learn sparse representations for raw inputs via an auto-encoder, the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence as a sparsity regularizer is introduced to the loss function for penalizing active code units. In fact, there exist other sparsity regularizers except the KL divergence. This paper introduces some classical sparsity regularizers into auto-encoders, and empirically gives a survey on the auto-encoders with different sparsity regularizers. Specifically, we analyze another two sparsity regularizers which are usually used in sparse coding. In addition, we also consider the effect of different activation functions and different sparsity regularizers on learning performance of auto-encoders. Our experiments are conducted on the datasets of MNIST and COIL.
  • Keywords
    "Visualization","Encoding"
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2015 International Joint Conference on
  • Electronic_ISBN
    2161-4407
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IJCNN.2015.7280364
  • Filename
    7280364