DocumentCode
3661057
Title
Comparison of auto-encoders with different sparsity regularizers
Author
Li Zhang; Yaping Lu
Author_Institution
School of Computer Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu, China
fYear
2015
fDate
7/1/2015 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
5
Abstract
Generally, in order to learn sparse representations for raw inputs via an auto-encoder, the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence as a sparsity regularizer is introduced to the loss function for penalizing active code units. In fact, there exist other sparsity regularizers except the KL divergence. This paper introduces some classical sparsity regularizers into auto-encoders, and empirically gives a survey on the auto-encoders with different sparsity regularizers. Specifically, we analyze another two sparsity regularizers which are usually used in sparse coding. In addition, we also consider the effect of different activation functions and different sparsity regularizers on learning performance of auto-encoders. Our experiments are conducted on the datasets of MNIST and COIL.
Keywords
"Visualization","Encoding"
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2015 International Joint Conference on
Electronic_ISBN
2161-4407
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/IJCNN.2015.7280364
Filename
7280364
Link To Document