DocumentCode :
3720562
Title :
Update strategies for HMM-based dynamic signature biometric systems
Author :
Ruben Tolosana;Ruben Vera-Rodriguez;Javier Ortega-Garcia;Julian Fierrez
Author_Institution :
Biometric Recognition Group - ATVS, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Avda. Francisco Tomas y Valiente, 11 - Campus de Cantoblanco - 28049, Spain
fYear :
2015
Firstpage :
1
Lastpage :
6
Abstract :
Biometric authentication on devices such as smartphones and tablets has increased significantly in the last years. One of the most acceptable and increasing traits is the handwriting signature as it has been used in financial and legal agreements scenarios for over a century. Nowadays, it is frequent to sign in banking and commercial areas on digitizing tablets. For these reasons, it is necessary to consider a new scenario where the number of training signatures available to generate the user template is variable and besides it has to be taken into account the lap of time between them (inter-session variability). In this work we focus on dynamic signature verification. The main goal of this work is to study system configuration update strategies of time functions-based systems such as Hidden Markov Model (HMM) and Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM). Therefore, two different cases have been considered. First, the usual case of having an HMM-based system with a fixed configuration (i.e. Baseline System). Second, an HMM-based and GMM-based systems whose configurations are optimized regarding the number of training signatures available to generate the user template. The experimental work has been carried out using an extended version of the Signature Long-Term database taking into account skilled and random or zero-effort forgeries. This database is comprised of a total of 6 different sessions distributed in a 15-month time span. Analyzing the results, the Proposed Systems achieve an average absolute improvement of 4.6% in terms of EER(%) for skilled forgeries cases compared to the Baseline System whereas the average absolute improvement for the random forgeries cases is of 2.7% EER. These results show the importance of optimizing the configuration of the systems compared to a fixed configuration system when the number of training signatures available to generate the user template increases.
Keywords :
"Hidden Markov models","Training","Forgery","Databases","Authentication","Performance evaluation","Biometrics (access control)"
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), 2015 IEEE International Workshop on
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/WIFS.2015.7368583
Filename :
7368583
Link To Document :
بازگشت