DocumentCode
3733234
Title
Validating model-based design simulation: The impact of abstraction and fidelity levels
Author
Irem Y. Tumer;Chris Hoyle;David C. Jensen;Sean Hunter
Author_Institution
School of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 97331
fYear
2015
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
6
Abstract
For many complex engineered systems, a risk informed approach to design is critical to ensure both robust safety and system reliability. Model-based design enables this through early design stage failure analysis. This paper describes initial work in the use of an experimental testbed to validate a function-based failure analysis method. The behavioral abstraction and model fidelity levels that allow this method to be used in the early design stages ultimately affect the validation metrics needed to understand and quantify the uncertainty of that analysis. To that end, in this paper, we present the computational and experimental simulation of failure scenarios on a robotic arm. This analysis provides insights into how behavioral abstraction relates to the type of behaviors that can be validated and how different model fidelity levels can be related to each other. Ultimately, the goal of this work is to develop a method and set of metrics for validating design-stage, model-based failure analysis. This research effort will enable objective comparison and certification of these design methods.
Keywords
"Analytical models","Computational modeling","Failure analysis","Robots","Complex systems","Atmospheric modeling"
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Complex Systems Engineering (ICCSE), 2015 International Conference on
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ComplexSys.2015.7385994
Filename
7385994
Link To Document