• DocumentCode
    3861401
  • Title

    MUfs and MOFs and LUFs and LOFs

  • Author

    George H. Hagn

  • Author_Institution
    Information and Telecommunications Sciences Center
  • Volume
    34
  • Issue
    6
  • fYear
    1992
  • Firstpage
    68
  • Lastpage
    73
  • Abstract
    One purpose of this column, "Stand on Standards," is to discuss antenna and propagation terms of controversy, with a goal of soliciting comments for the Subcommittees on Definitions, which are working toward standardized definitions. As noted in my column on fading (in the August, 1992, issue of the Magazine), this can be rather dry and tedious work which is not of great general interest. While this particular column may be of most interest to only a relatively small (and aging?) percentage of the Magazine´s readership, it is an attempted start at cleaning up some old business that is receiving renewed attention, internationally. Despite continuing rumors of its demise, HF has exhibited great longevity, since its first use just after the turn of the century. This is true even though satellites and modern cables have largely replaced it as the primary medium for long-distance communication, in most cases. Therefore, please bear with me, as we revisit the definition of MUFs and LUFs, MOFs and LOFs, and related terms.
  • Keywords
    "Ionosphere","IEEE Standards","Antennas","IEC Standards","Propagation losses","Frequency measurement"
  • Journal_Title
    IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1045-9243
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/MAP.1992.7499629
  • Filename
    7499629