DocumentCode
39616
Title
A Perturbation Analysis on the Performance of TOA and TDOA Localization in Mixed LOS/NLOS Environments
Author
Hara, Satoshi ; Anzai, Daisuke ; Yabu, T. ; Kyesan Lee ; Derham, Thomas ; Zemek, R.
Author_Institution
Grad. Sch. of Eng., Osaka City Univ., Osaka, Japan
Volume
61
Issue
2
fYear
2013
fDate
Feb-13
Firstpage
679
Lastpage
689
Abstract
In cellular communication systems where non-line-of-sight (NLOS) channels are dominant as compared to line-of-sight (LOS) channels, a time difference of arrival (TDOA) localization method can outperform a time of arrival (TOA) localization method, although the TDOA method loses one degree of freedom in the number of usable range estimates when selecting a range estimate as the reference and doubles the variance of range sampling error when subtracting the reference range estimate. In this paper, we first show the computer simulation result on the localization performance of conventional TOA and TDOA methods in mixed LOS/NLOS environments, and then validate it by theoretical analysis. Here, we analyze the root mean square localization error by decomposing it into two factors; for one factor, which is the contribution from range sampling error, we evaluate it by the Cramer-Rao lower-bound, whereas for the other factor, which is the contribution from positively biased NLOS range error, we analyze it by perturbation method. We show that the theoretical result can well explain the localization performance by computer simulation for both the TOA and TDOA methods, and furthermore, we derive a simple condition among the number of cells, the average and variance of NLOS range error distribution which can correctly predict whether the TDOA method outperforms the TOA method or not for the case of all NLOS channels.
Keywords
cellular radio; channel estimation; mean square error methods; sampling methods; time-of-arrival estimation; wireless channels; Cramer-Rao lower-bound; TDOA; TOA; cellular communication system; computer simulation; mixed LOS-NLOS channel environment; perturbation method; positively biased NLOS range error; range sampling error variance; root mean square localization error; theoretical analysis; time difference of arrival localization method; time of arrival localization method; Channel estimation; Computer simulation; Delay; Estimation; Nonlinear optics; Perturbation methods; Vectors; NLOS; TDOA; TOA; perturbation method;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Communications, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0090-6778
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TCOMM.2013.012313.110509
Filename
6427618
Link To Document