• DocumentCode
    404082
  • Title

    Study on the relationships between two typical modeling methods in process control

  • Author

    Danying Gu ; Liu, Tao ; Zhang, Weidong

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Autom., Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ., China
  • Volume
    4
  • fYear
    2003
  • fDate
    9-12 Dec. 2003
  • Firstpage
    4082
  • Abstract
    There are two typical modeling methods for PID design and tuning in process control: step response method and self-oscillation method. The former usually results in a first-order plus dead-time model and the later gives ultimate gain and ultimate frequency of controlled plant. Usually the two modeling methods are considered different. The aim of this paper is to bridge the gap between them. In this paper, some internal relationships between the two modeling methods are studied. Analytical mapping expressions between them are derived with time domain and frequency domain analysis method, respectively. This implies that PID design and tuning techniques need not be limited to either step response method or the self-oscillation method only. Thus, the designer can have more choices for PID controller design and tuning.
  • Keywords
    control system synthesis; frequency-domain analysis; process control; step response; three-term control; time-domain analysis; PID controller design; PID controller tuning; analytical mapping expressions; first order plus dead-time model; frequency domain analysis; plant modeling methods; process control; self oscillation method; step response method; time domain analysis; Automation; Bridges; Design methodology; Equations; Frequency domain analysis; Process control; System testing; Three-term control; Time domain analysis; Tuning;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Decision and Control, 2003. Proceedings. 42nd IEEE Conference on
  • ISSN
    0191-2216
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-7924-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/CDC.2003.1271790
  • Filename
    1271790