• DocumentCode
    407055
  • Title

    Scalable self-stabilization via composition

  • Author

    Leal, William ; Arora, Anish

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput. & Inf. Sci., Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH, USA
  • fYear
    2004
  • fDate
    2004
  • Firstpage
    12
  • Lastpage
    21
  • Abstract
    Objections to the practical use of stabilization have centered around problems of scale. Because of potential interferences between actions, global reasoning over the entire system is in general necessary. The complexity of this task increases dramatically as systems grow in size. Alternatives to dealing with this complexity focus on reset and composition. For reset, the problem is that any fault, no matter how minor, will cause a complete system reset with potentially significant lack of availability. For existing compositional alternatives, including compositional reset, severe restrictions on candidate systems are imposed. To address these issues, we give a framework for composition in which global reasoning and detailed system knowledge are not necessary, and which apply to a significantly wider range of systems than has hitherto been possible. We explicitly identify for each component which other components it can corrupt. Additionally, the correction of one component often depends on the prior correction of one or more other components, constraining the order in which correction can take place. Given appropriate component stabilizers such as detectors and correctors, we offer several ways to coordinate system correction, depending on what is actually known about the corruption and correction relations. By reducing the design of and reasoning about stabilization to local activities involving each component and the neighbors with which it interacts, the framework is scalable. Reset is generally avoided by using the correction relation to check and correct only where necessary. By including both correction and corruption relations, the framework subsumes and extends other compositional approaches. Though not directly a part of this work, we mention tools and techniques that can be used to help calculate the dependency and corruption relations and to help create the necessary stabilizers. To illustrate the theory, we show how this framework has been applied in our work in sensor networks.
  • Keywords
    distributed processing; system recovery; appropriate component stabilizers; coordinate system correction; global reasoning; scalable self-stabilization; sensor networks; Computer bugs; Computer errors; Contracts; Detectors; Information science; Interference; Local activities; Network servers; Temperature sensors; Wireless networks;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Distributed Computing Systems, 2004. Proceedings. 24th International Conference on
  • ISSN
    1063-6927
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7695-2086-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICDCS.2004.1281563
  • Filename
    1281563