DocumentCode :
418958
Title :
Comparing Xpatch, FISC, and ScaleME using a cone-cylinder
Author :
Hastriter, Michael Larkin ; Chew, Weng Cho
Author_Institution :
Air Force Inst. of Technol., Wright- Patterson AFB, OH, USA
Volume :
2
fYear :
2004
fDate :
20-25 June 2004
Firstpage :
2007
Abstract :
Many people that use computational electromagnetics to produce data are interested in two factors: speed and accuracy. To appreciate the tradeoff, it is imperative that data creation be well understood. The speed and accuracy tradeoff produces error sources. The paper compares data produced using high frequency techniques and the method of moments (MoM) accelerated by the multilevel fast multipole algorithm (MLFMA) (Chew, W.C. et al., 2001) using a cone-cylinder target. High frequency techniques break down as the target becomes smaller in terms of wavelengths. On the other hand, the MoM stretches the computing resources for increasing problem size. A missile-shaped target, a cone-cylinder called "the pencil", is used as a test object to create data for comparison using Xpatch, FISC, and ScaleME electromagnetic modeling and simulation software.
Keywords :
computational electromagnetics; digital simulation; electromagnetic wave scattering; method of moments; military computing; military radar; radar computing; 500 MHz to 12 GHz; FISC; MLFMA; ScaleME; Xpatch; computational electromagnetics; cone-cylinder target; data creation; electromagnetic modeling software; electromagnetic simulation software; error sources; method of moments; missile-shaped target; multilevel FMA; multilevel fast multipole algorithm; scattering; speed-accuracy tradeoff; Acceleration; Azimuth; Computational electromagnetics; Costs; Frequency; MLFMA; Message-oriented middleware; Moment methods; Polarization; Testing;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 2004. IEEE
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-8302-8
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/APS.2004.1330600
Filename :
1330600
Link To Document :
بازگشت