• DocumentCode
    424658
  • Title

    On motion control design and tuning techniques

  • Author

    Goforth, Frank J.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Cleveland State Univ., OH, USA
  • Volume
    1
  • fYear
    2004
  • fDate
    June 30 2004-July 2 2004
  • Firstpage
    716
  • Abstract
    The conventional proportional, integral, derivative (PID) controller/and some common linear variations to PID, are evaluated along with recently introduced parameterized loop shaping and active disturbance rejection control (ADRC). The evaluation is made using a simulation of a nonlinear DC servomotor driven "pick & place" positioning system that includes control input saturation, power amplifier saturation, motor current limit, viscous and coulomb friction, and gear backlash. The effects of adding torque disturbance, sensor noise, mechanical resonance, and load changes are examined for the various control methods. The relative merits of these control techniques in regards ease of controller design and tuning versus performance are summarized.
  • Keywords
    DC motors; control system synthesis; machine control; motion control; position control; servomotors; three-term control; tuning; PID control; active disturbance rejection control; motion control design; motion control tuning technique; nonlinear DC servomotor; parameterized loop shaping;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    American Control Conference, 2004. Proceedings of the 2004
  • Conference_Location
    Boston, MA, USA
  • ISSN
    0743-1619
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8335-4
  • Type

    conf

  • Filename
    1383689