• DocumentCode
    432498
  • Title

    JPEG2000 vs. JPEG from an image retrieval point of view

  • Author

    Schaefer, Gerald

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Comput. & Technol., Nottingham Trent Univ., UK
  • Volume
    1
  • fYear
    2004
  • fDate
    24-27 Oct. 2004
  • Firstpage
    437
  • Abstract
    It is well known that JPEG2000 has a variety of advantages over its predecessor JPEG. JPEG2000 not only allows images to be coded with clearly better visual image quality, it also addresses a series of other issues. Unification of lossless and lossy compression modes, robustness to bit-errors to allow image transmission over noisy channels and provision of regions of interest (ROI) are only some of those that have been incorporated into the new standard. In this paper we look at the JPEG2000 versus JPEG debate from an image retrieval standpoint. While it seems evident that image compression will have a negative effect on the performance of retrieval algorithms our aim is to provide quantitative results of how severe this performance drop would be for JPEG2000 compression in comparison to standard JPEG encoding. Our results show that while high compression causes problems for retrieval of JPEG images, the retrieval performance of JPEG2000 images is almost independent of compression ratio.
  • Keywords
    code standards; data compression; image coding; image retrieval; JPEG; JPEG2000; image coding; image compression; image retrieval; performance; Digital cameras; Hardware; Histograms; Image coding; Image databases; Image quality; Image retrieval; Propagation losses; Transform coding; Video sequences;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04. 2004 International Conference on
  • ISSN
    1522-4880
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8554-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICIP.2004.1418784
  • Filename
    1418784