DocumentCode
442861
Title
Re-projective vs. projective camera calibration: effects on 3D-reconstruction
Author
Hanning, T. ; Graf, S. ; Kellner, M.
Author_Institution
Passau Univ., Germany
Volume
2
fYear
2005
fDate
14-14 Sept. 2005
Lastpage
1170
Abstract
The camera mapping can be seen in two ways. The classic approach is to emphasize the projective nature of the camera. But also every point in the image plane determines a viewing ray by its re-projection. Both mappings can be described by the same set of parameters. In fact the re-projective camera mapping can be seen as the inversion of the projective camera mapping. In this article we compare two error functions for a camera calibration. The projective error function measures the distance of the projected prototype to the observed points in the image plane. The re-projective error function measures the distance of the prototype to the reprojected rays which are determined by the observed points. We present calibration algorithms for both error functions and compare them with regard to the 3D-reconstruction problem.
Keywords
calibration; cameras; image reconstruction; 3D-reconstruction; camera mapping; projective camera calibration; projective error function; reprojective camera mapping; Application software; Calibration; Cameras; Computer errors; Computer vision; Coordinate measuring machines; Image reconstruction; Optimization methods; Prototypes; Stereo vision;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Image Processing, 2005. ICIP 2005. IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location
Genova
Print_ISBN
0-7803-9134-9
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICIP.2005.1530269
Filename
1530269
Link To Document