• DocumentCode
    4545
  • Title

    Reusing Genetic Programming for Ensemble Selection in Classification of Unbalanced Data

  • Author

    Bhowan, Urvesh ; Johnston, Michael ; Mengjie Zhang ; Xin Yao

  • Author_Institution
    Knowledge & Data Eng. Group, Trinity Coll. Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • Volume
    18
  • Issue
    6
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    Dec. 2014
  • Firstpage
    893
  • Lastpage
    908
  • Abstract
    Classification algorithms can suffer from performance degradation when the class distribution is unbalanced. This paper develops a two-step approach to evolving ensembles using genetic programming (GP) for unbalanced data. The first step uses multiobjective (MO) GP to evolve a Pareto-approximated front of GP classifiers to form the ensemble by trading-off the minority and the majority class against each other during learning. The MO component alleviates the reliance on sampling to artificially rebalance the data. The second step, which is the focus this paper, proposes a novel ensemble selection approach using GP to automatically find/choose the best individuals for the ensemble. This new GP approach combines multiple Pareto-approximated front members into a single composite genetic program solution to represent the (optimized) ensemble. This ensemble representation has two main advantages/novelties over traditional genetic algorithm (GA) approaches. First, by limiting the depth of the composite solution trees, we use selection pressure during evolution to find small highly-cooperative groups of individuals for the ensemble. This means that ensemble sizes are not fixed a priori (as in GA), but vary depending on the strength of the base learners. Second, we compare different function set operators in the composite solution trees to explore new ways to aggregate the member outputs and thus, control how the ensemble computes its output. We show that the proposed GP approach evolves smaller more diverse ensembles compared to an established ensemble selection algorithm, while still performing as well as, or better than the established approach. The evolved GP ensembles also perform well compared to other bagging and boosting approaches, particularly on tasks with high levels of class imbalance.
  • Keywords
    Pareto optimisation; approximation theory; genetic algorithms; learning (artificial intelligence); pattern classification; trees (mathematics); GP classifiers; Pareto-approximated front; bagging approach; boosting approach; composite solution trees; ensemble selection approach; genetic programming; learning; single composite genetic program solution; unbalanced data classification; Accuracy; Bagging; Genetic algorithms; Silicon; Sociology; Statistics; Training; Classification; ensemble machine learning; genetic programming; unbalanced data;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1089-778X
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TEVC.2013.2293393
  • Filename
    6677603