Notice of Violation of IEEE Publication PrinciplesTowards a Unified Framework for Complexity Measurement in Aspect-Oriented Systems

Notice of Violation of IEEE Publication Principles

"Towards a Unified Framework for Complexity Measurement in Aspect-Oriented Systems,"
by A. Kumar, R. Kumar, P.S. Grover
in the Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, vol.2, pp.98-103, Dec. 2008

After careful and considered review of the content and authorship of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE\´s Publication Principles.

This paper contains significant portions of original text from the paper cited below. The original text was copied without attribution (including appropriate references to the original author(s) and/or paper title) and without permission.

Due to the nature of this violation, reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper, and future references should be made to the following article:

"Towards a Unified Coupling Framework for Measuring Aspect-oriented Programs"
by T.T. Bartolomei, A. Garcia, C. Sant\´Anna, C., E. Figueiredo
in the Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Software Quality Assurance (Portland, Oregon, November 06 - 06, 2006). SOQUA \´06. ACM

Aspect-oriented programming (AOP) is an emerging technique that provides a mechanism to clearly encapsulate and implement concerns that crosscut other modules. It is claimed that this technique improves code modularization and therefore reduce complexity of object-oriented programs (OOP). Most of the proposed complexity measurement frameworks and metrics for AOP are for AspectJ programming language. In this paper we have defined a generic complexity measurement framework that takes into account three, the most well known families of available AOP languages, AspectJ, CaesarJ and Hyper/J. The proposed unified framework contributes to better understanding of complexity in AOP, which in turn help to (i) define new complexity metrics whic- h permit the analysis and comparison of Java, AspectJ, CaesarJ and Hyper/J implementations, and (ii) integrating different existing measures and examine same concepts in different ways.