Title :
Low Insertion Loss and Highly Sensitive SH-SAW Sensors Based on 36° YX LiTaO3 Through the Incorporation of Filled Microcavities
Author :
Richardson, Mark ; Sankaranarayanan, Subramanian K. R. S. ; Bhethanabotla, Venkat R.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Chem. & Biomed. Eng., Univ. of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
Abstract :
Reduction in power consumption and improvement in mass sensitivity are important considerations for surface acoustic wave (SAW) devices used in various sensing applications. Detection of minute quantities of a particular species (clinical sensing) and power requirements (wireless sensing) are two key metrics that must be optimized. In this paper, a 3-D finite element model (FEM) was employed to compare insertion loss (IL) and mass sensitivity of SAW sensors having microcavities filled with ZnO and nanocrystalline diamond to a standard two-port SAW design. Initial simulation results show that ZnO filled cavities (depth = 5 μm) were most effective at reducing power loss ΔIL = (6.03 dB) by increasing particle displacement (acousto-electric to mechanical transduction) at the output transducer. A 100-pg/cm2 load was applied to the sensing area of each device to evaluate mass sensitivity. Our simulations suggest that ZnO filled cavities with shallow depth (2.5 μm) have the greatest sensitivity. The FEM simulations are used to understand the acoustic wave propagation in microcavity-based SAW sensors. The observed enhancement in mass sensitivity and power transfer is attributed to waveguiding effects and constructive interference of the scattered acoustic waves from the microcavities. Devices fabricated with microcavities ~1 μm deep decreased IL by 3.306 dB compared with a standard SAW device. Additional simulations were conducted for each device configuration using the same depth in order to make a direct comparison between measured and simulated results. Our findings offer encouraging prospects for designing low IL highly sensitive microcavity-based SAW biosensors.
Keywords :
II-VI semiconductors; acoustic wave interference; acoustic wave propagation; acoustic wave scattering; finite element analysis; lithium compounds; mass measurement; microcavities; microfabrication; microsensors; nanosensors; nanostructured materials; surface acoustic wave sensors; surface acoustic wave transducers; wide band gap semiconductors; zinc compounds; 3D finite element model; FEM; IL; LiTaO3-ZnO; SH-SAW sensor; acoustic wave propagation; acoustic wave scattering; acoustoelectric transduction; clinical sensing; constructive interference; depth 2.5 mum; depth 5 mum; filled microcavity; insertion loss; loss 3.306 dB; loss 6.03 dB; mass sensitivity; mechanical transduction; microcavity-based SAW biosensor; nanocrystalline diamond; power consumption; standard two-port SAW design; surface acoustic wave sensor; waveguiding effect; wireless sensing; Microcavities; Sensors; Substrates; Surface acoustic wave devices; Surface acoustic waves; Zinc oxide; ANSYS; biosensors; finite element modeling (FEM); frequency response; insertion loss (IL) piezoelectric materials; surface acoustic waves (SAW);
Journal_Title :
Sensors Journal, IEEE
DOI :
10.1109/JSEN.2014.2353794