• DocumentCode
    53409
  • Title

    Cross-Sensor Continuity of Satellite-Derived Water Clarity in the Gulf of Mexico: Insights Into Temporal Aliasing and Implications for Long-Term Water Clarity Assessment

  • Author

    Barnes, Brian B. ; Chuanmin Hu

  • Author_Institution
    Coll. of Marine Sci., Univ. of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL, USA
  • Volume
    53
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    Apr-15
  • Firstpage
    1761
  • Lastpage
    1772
  • Abstract
    Addressing critical earth science questions often requires time scales beyond the life of any single satellite sensor. Overlap between satellite-based datasets allows for the quantification of continuity (and discrepancies) between sensors. Toward that end, collocated matchups between Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-View Sensor (SeaWiFS), Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and Visible Infrared Imager Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) water clarity data from the Gulf of Mexico were analyzed at simultaneous, daily, and monthly time scales. Simultaneous data indicated strong agreement between sensors, with unbiased percent difference (UPD) generally less than 10% for both SeaWiFS/MODIS and VIIRS/MODIS matchups, with no apparent temporal trends. Spatially, UPD was highest near frontal boundaries and at high sensor zenith angles, while bias showed nearshore/offshore trends. UPD and bias statistics did not diminish for daily matchups; however, large degradation was seen for comparisons of monthly means between sensors, particularly SeaWiFS/MODIS matchups. Data coverage represented an important factor contributing to uncertainties in monthly mean data, as higher UPD was observed when fewer valid satellite measurements were recorded. Requiring a minimum of 15 samples per pixel per month minimizes the uncertainties in monthly mean products, with UPD between satellites roughly equivalent to that for simultaneous matchups. Overall, these findings demonstrate high consistency between three satellite instruments for most locations, while several “hot spots” of inconsistency are also revealed, which should be avoided in time-series studies. The findings also highlight the need to quantify uncertainties in often-used satellite products (particularly monthly mean composites) as well as the need to have a sufficient number of observations to assure the fidelity of monthly means.
  • Keywords
    artificial satellites; geophysical signal processing; oceanographic regions; remote sensing; salinity (geophysical); Gulf of Mexico; MODIS data; Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer data; SeaWiFS; VIIRS data; Visible Infrared Imager Radiometer Suite data; cross sensor continuity; data coverage; fidelity; long term water clarity assessment; satellite derived water clarity; satellite sensor; temporal aliasing; unbiased percent difference; MODIS; NASA; Satellites; Sea measurements; Sensors; Time series analysis; Uncertainty; Diffuse attenuation coefficient; Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS); Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-View Sensor (SeaWiFS); Visible Infrared Imager Radiometer Suite (VIIRS);
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0196-2892
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TGRS.2014.2348713
  • Filename
    6891186