• DocumentCode
    548954
  • Title

    Is burst loss worse than random loss for video transmission?

  • Author

    Jimin Xiao ; Tillo, Tammam ; Chunyu Lin

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. Eng. & Electron., Univ. of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • fYear
    2011
  • fDate
    16-18 June 2011
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    4
  • Abstract
    Many papers have shown that burst loss causes more severe damage to the reconstructed video quality than random loss for the same packet loss rate. With traditional interleaving methods, the consecutive lost packet positions will be interleaved to random positions, and after interleaving, the PSNR of burst loss can be close to the PSNR of random loss for the same packet loss rate. In this paper, a novel slice reorder and packetization (SRP) approach is proposed which fully utilizes the temporal correlation between slices in successive frames. Theoretical analysis is presented that explains why with the proposed approach, burst loss can be better than random loss for the same packet loss rate. The effect of the proposed approach is validated with H.264/AVC coded video. The simulation results show that with the proposed approach, the PSNR of the burst loss can be up to more than 2dB higher than random loss without adding any redundant information.
  • Keywords
    interleaved codes; video coding; video communication; H.264-AVC video coding; PSNR; burst loss; interleaving methods; packet loss rate; random loss; slice reorder and packetization; video quality reconstruction; video transmission; Bridges; Correlation; Encoding; PSNR; Pixel; Propagation losses; Video sequences; H.264/AVC; Rate Distortion; burst loss; error resilience; random loss; slice;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP), 2011 18th International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Sarajevo
  • ISSN
    2157-8672
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4577-0074-3
  • Type

    conf

  • Filename
    5977359