• DocumentCode
    582341
  • Title

    Performance robustness comparison of ADRC and GPC

  • Author

    Li Qiang ; Li Donghai ; Tan Wen

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Control & Comput. Eng., North China Electr. Power Univ., Beijing, China
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    25-27 July 2012
  • Firstpage
    4586
  • Lastpage
    4590
  • Abstract
    Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) has been shown to be able to achieve good performance by lots of simulations and practical applications since it is first introduced. However, most of the numerous studies were based on comparison with PID controllers. This paper will compare the performance of second-order linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC) and generalized predictive control (GPC). Second-order LADRC and GPC controllers are designed for six typical models such that both controllers for each model achieve the same nominal disturbance rejection performance, then Monte-Carlo simulation is adopted to test the robustness of the two controllers. Simulation results show that the second-order LADRC has good performance robustness.
  • Keywords
    Monte Carlo methods; control system synthesis; predictive control; three-term control; GPC controllers; LADRC; Monte-Carlo simulation; PID controllers; generalized predictive control; nominal disturbance rejection performance; performance robustness; second-order linear active disturbance rejection control; Computers; Educational institutions; Electronic mail; Power systems; Predictive control; Robustness; Thermal engineering; Active Disturbance Rejection Control; Generalized Predictive Control; Performance Robustness;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Control Conference (CCC), 2012 31st Chinese
  • Conference_Location
    Hefei
  • ISSN
    1934-1768
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4673-2581-3
  • Type

    conf

  • Filename
    6390732