• DocumentCode
    58288
  • Title

    Proposal rejected: the next step

  • Author

    Gaynor, Gerard

  • Volume
    42
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    Fourth Quarter 2014
  • Firstpage
    5
  • Lastpage
    6
  • Abstract
    In another article, the author referred to his observations regarding the manner in which members of the technical community (engineers, scientists, software developers, etc.) handle rejection of ideas, proposals, and other recommendations. Too often, once a proposal has been made and rejected it dies; the originators consider the issue as "case closed." This type of behavior is disconcerting, because people who can articulate an idea so as to inspire confidence and guide its implementation are the organization\´s future, but it demands passion and dedication to reach a conclusion; it demands an attitude that allows for the unconventional thought architects to create an innovation environment. We\´re considering "Bottom-Up" innovation, not Top-Down. · Well-intentioned failure is acceptable; failure occurring through negligence requires some form of resolution. · Innovation = invention + commercialization or implementation; no commercialization or implementation, no innovation.
  • Keywords
    innovation management; bottom-up innovation; innovation environment; technical community; top-down inovation; Commercialization; Engineering profession; Lead; Organizations; Proposals; Technological innovation;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Engineering Management Review, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0360-8581
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/EMR.2014.2364653
  • Filename
    6966938