Author :
Krauss, W. Fritz ; Rubenstein, Seth ; Crocker, John
Abstract :
Despite the tremendous expenditure of time, money and effort for well over the last decade, we still struggle to determine whether we are actually better prepared to respond to a disaster. This article posits current processes lack the rigor and standards required to effectively manage and evaluate preparedness, response and recovery in a repeatable manner. The article proposes the adoption of a structured methodology organizes capabilities, responsibilities, and expectations at four “Levels of Focus” informed by Elliott Jaques Requisite Organization (1998) identified as Policy, Strategy, Operations, and Tactics (Jacques, 1998) (Krauss & Rubenstein 2011) (Krauss, 2013) and four “Layers of Response” identified as Local, Regional, State and ational as drawn from the ational Response Framework. The article further proposes the implementation of a structured methodology will enhance collaboration and facilitate utilization of technology to effectively improve preparedness, response and recovery.
Keywords :
disasters; emergency management; disaster management; disaster preparedness; disaster recovery; disaster response; emergency response management; local response level; national response framework; national response level; operations focus level; policy focus level; regional response level; state response level; strategy focus level; structured methodology; tactics focus level; Communities; Emergency services; Government; Industries; Planning; Synchronization; Layers of Response; Levels of Focus; Policy; Preparedness; Recovery; Response; Strategy;