DocumentCode :
65072
Title :
GENESHIFT: A Nonparametric Approach for Integrating Microarray Gene Expression Data Based on the Inner Product as a Distance Measure between the Distributions of Genes
Author :
Lazar, Corneliu ; Taminau, Jonatan ; Meganck, Stijn ; Steenhoff, David ; Coletta, Alessandro ; Solis, David Y. Weiss ; Molter, Colin ; Duque, R. ; Bersini, Hugues ; Nowe, Ann
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Comput. Sci., Vrije Univ. Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Volume :
10
Issue :
2
fYear :
2013
fDate :
March-April 2013
Firstpage :
383
Lastpage :
392
Abstract :
The potential of microarray gene expression (MAGE) data is only partially explored due to the limited number of samples in individual studies. This limitation can be surmounted by merging or integrating data sets originating from independent MAGE experiments, which are designed to study the same biological problem. However, this process is hindered by batch effects that are study-dependent and result in random data distortion; therefore numerical transformations are needed to render the integration of different data sets accurate and meaningful. Our contribution in this paper is two-fold. First we propose GENESHIFT, a new nonparametric batch effect removal method based on two key elements from statistics: empirical density estimation and the inner product as a distance measure between two probability density functions; second we introduce a new validation index of batch effect removal methods based on the observation that samples from two independent studies drawn from a same population should exhibit similar probability density functions. We evaluated and compared the GENESHIFT method with four other state-of-the-art methods for batch effect removal: Batch-mean centering, empirical Bayes or COMBAT, distance-weighted discrimination, and cross-platform normalization. Several validation indices providing complementary information about the efficiency of batch effect removal methods have been employed in our validation framework. The results show that none of the methods clearly outperforms the others. More than that, most of the methods used for comparison perform very well with respect to some validation indices while performing very poor with respect to others. GENESHIFT exhibits robust performances and its average rank is the highest among the average ranks of all methods used for comparison.
Keywords :
Bayes methods; bioinformatics; data analysis; data integration; genetics; genomics; statistics; Batch-mean centering; COMBAT; GENESHIFT method; MAGE data; biological problem; cross-platform normalization; data set integration; distance measure; distance-weighted discrimination; empirical Bayes method; empirical density estimation; gene distribution; independent MAGE experiment; inner product; microarray gene expression data; nonparametric batch effect removal method; numerical transformation; probability density function; random data distortion; statistics; validation framework; validation index; Data integration; Estimation; Gene expression; Lungs; Sociology; Statistics; Batch effects; Data integration; Estimation; Gene expression; Lungs; Sociology; Statistics; density estimation; distance measures between probability density functions; inner product; integrative analysis of gene expression microarrays; microarray data integration; nonparametric methods; Computational Biology; Computer Simulation; Databases, Genetic; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; Models, Statistical; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; Reproducibility of Results; Software; Statistics, Nonparametric; Tissue Array Analysis;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, IEEE/ACM Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
1545-5963
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/TCBB.2013.12
Filename :
6468037
Link To Document :
بازگشت