• DocumentCode
    65072
  • Title

    GENESHIFT: A Nonparametric Approach for Integrating Microarray Gene Expression Data Based on the Inner Product as a Distance Measure between the Distributions of Genes

  • Author

    Lazar, Corneliu ; Taminau, Jonatan ; Meganck, Stijn ; Steenhoff, David ; Coletta, Alessandro ; Solis, David Y. Weiss ; Molter, Colin ; Duque, R. ; Bersini, Hugues ; Nowe, Ann

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput. Sci., Vrije Univ. Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
  • Volume
    10
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    March-April 2013
  • Firstpage
    383
  • Lastpage
    392
  • Abstract
    The potential of microarray gene expression (MAGE) data is only partially explored due to the limited number of samples in individual studies. This limitation can be surmounted by merging or integrating data sets originating from independent MAGE experiments, which are designed to study the same biological problem. However, this process is hindered by batch effects that are study-dependent and result in random data distortion; therefore numerical transformations are needed to render the integration of different data sets accurate and meaningful. Our contribution in this paper is two-fold. First we propose GENESHIFT, a new nonparametric batch effect removal method based on two key elements from statistics: empirical density estimation and the inner product as a distance measure between two probability density functions; second we introduce a new validation index of batch effect removal methods based on the observation that samples from two independent studies drawn from a same population should exhibit similar probability density functions. We evaluated and compared the GENESHIFT method with four other state-of-the-art methods for batch effect removal: Batch-mean centering, empirical Bayes or COMBAT, distance-weighted discrimination, and cross-platform normalization. Several validation indices providing complementary information about the efficiency of batch effect removal methods have been employed in our validation framework. The results show that none of the methods clearly outperforms the others. More than that, most of the methods used for comparison perform very well with respect to some validation indices while performing very poor with respect to others. GENESHIFT exhibits robust performances and its average rank is the highest among the average ranks of all methods used for comparison.
  • Keywords
    Bayes methods; bioinformatics; data analysis; data integration; genetics; genomics; statistics; Batch-mean centering; COMBAT; GENESHIFT method; MAGE data; biological problem; cross-platform normalization; data set integration; distance measure; distance-weighted discrimination; empirical Bayes method; empirical density estimation; gene distribution; independent MAGE experiment; inner product; microarray gene expression data; nonparametric batch effect removal method; numerical transformation; probability density function; random data distortion; statistics; validation framework; validation index; Data integration; Estimation; Gene expression; Lungs; Sociology; Statistics; Batch effects; Data integration; Estimation; Gene expression; Lungs; Sociology; Statistics; density estimation; distance measures between probability density functions; inner product; integrative analysis of gene expression microarrays; microarray data integration; nonparametric methods; Computational Biology; Computer Simulation; Databases, Genetic; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; Models, Statistical; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; Reproducibility of Results; Software; Statistics, Nonparametric; Tissue Array Analysis;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, IEEE/ACM Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1545-5963
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TCBB.2013.12
  • Filename
    6468037