• DocumentCode
    654411
  • Title

    The use of a Classroom Response System to more effectively flip the classroom

  • Author

    Lucke, Terry ; Keyssner, Ulrike ; Dunn, Peter

  • Author_Institution
    Fac. of Sci., Health, Educ. & Eng., Univ. of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    23-26 Oct. 2013
  • Firstpage
    491
  • Lastpage
    495
  • Abstract
    Classroom Response Systems (CRS) have been shown to improve student learning outcomes by encouraging student engagement with the course content, instructors and student peers. The system´s ability to provide immediate and quality feedback to both students and instructors, particularly in large classes, is highly desirable. While CRS has been used for well over a decade and been shown to successfully improve student engagement and participation, a number of studies have also identified that its use could potentially mean that less material is able to be covered in lectures. Clearly, the approach of cramming CRS into already content-heavy class time does not embrace the potential for CRS to improve student engagement and student learning. The use of CRS should be planned as an integral component of the course which enhances and reinforces the learning outcomes. The effectiveness of CRS depends strongly on the quality and variety of the questions, and the design of the activities to encourage students to engage with the questions. This case study explores the use of a new, low-cost, state-ofthe-art CRS (Top Hat Monocle) which allows students to use their mobile devices (phones, tablets, laptops) to respond to a variety of numerical, multiple-choice, short-answer and open-ended discussion questions posed during face-to-face workshops. In order to allow sufficient time to fully engage with the workshop activities traditional lectures were revised and the classroom lecture was flipped. Students worked through narrated lecture material (hand-e-lectures) online, prior to attending the workshops. CRS was included as part of the e-lecture content and feedback from this was incorporated into the workshops. Workshops extended the e-lecture content by including a variety of carefully designed, engaging activities (many were group activities) that used CRS questions to facilitate discussions, problem solving and case study analysis to enhance student cognition. Overall, the new- flipped lecture and CRS teaching format demonstrated a substantial increase in the level of student engagement, motivation and attendance compared to previous cohorts.
  • Keywords
    cognition; computer aided instruction; educational courses; mobile computing; mobile radio; teaching; CRS teaching format; classroom lecture; classroom response systems; course content; e-lecture content; face-to-face workshops; flipped lecture; hand-e-lectures; instructors; laptops; lecture material; low-cost state-ofthe-art CRS; mobile devices; multiple-choice discussion questions; numerical discussion questions; open-ended discussion questions; phones; quality feedback; short-answer discussion questions; student attendance; student cognition; student engagement; student learning outcomes; student motivation; student participation; student peers; tablets; top hat monocle; workshop activities; Cognition; Conferences; Education; Materials; Mobile handsets; Noise level; Portable computers; Classroom response systems (CRS); Top Hat Monocle; engagement; flipped classroom; hand-e-lecture;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Frontiers in Education Conference, 2013 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Oklahoma City, OK
  • ISSN
    0190-5848
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/FIE.2013.6684872
  • Filename
    6684872