Title :
Comparison between PFC and PID control system for tendon-driven balloon actuator
Author :
Nagase, Jun-ya ; Hamada, Kazuya ; Satoh, T. ; Saga, Norihiko ; Suzumori, Koichi
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Mech. & Syst. Eng., Ryukoku Univ., Otsu, Japan
Abstract :
In recent years, Japanese society has been aging, engendering a labor shortage of young workers. For a robot that is often in contact with people and which must provide safety and flexibility in nursing and welfare, the development of a soft, lightweight, and compact actuator has been sought. Particularly robots that are intended for use in the field of medical care and welfare should be safe when functioning around humans because they often come into contact with people. Therefore, a tendon-driven balloon actuator (balloon actuator) has been developed for a robot hand to be used in such environments. For this study, we developed a stroke control system for a balloon actuator using a predictive functional control (PFC). Predictive functional control is one model based on a predictive control (MPC) scheme, which predicts the future outputs of the actual plant over the prediction horizon and computes the control effort over the control horizon at every sampling instance. This paper reports the PFC control performance of the balloon actuator. We compared the control performance for the actuator with that of a PFC and PID control system.
Keywords :
actuators; balloons; human-robot interaction; predictive control; service robots; three-term control; Japanese society; PFC; PID control system; compact actuator; control horizon; labor shortage; medical care; prediction horizon; predictive functional control; robot; sampling instance; stroke control system; tendon-driven balloon actuator; welfare; Actuators; Mathematical model; PD control; Thumb; Trajectory; Predictive functional control; pneumatic balloon; soft actuator; tendon-driven system;
Conference_Titel :
Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE
Conference_Location :
Vienna
DOI :
10.1109/IECON.2013.6699674