• DocumentCode
    686613
  • Title

    Analysis of three-dimensional joint space of the tibiofemoral joint

  • Author

    Jang-Hwan Choi ; McWalter, Emily J. ; Pal, Shovon ; Maier, Andreas ; Gold, Garry E. ; Fahrig, Rebecca

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Mech. Eng. & Radiol., Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, USA
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    Oct. 27 2013-Nov. 2 2013
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    4
  • Abstract
    The purpose of this study was to quantify in vivo the differences in knee joint space volume between upright, weightbearing and supine, non-weightbearing conditions using C-arm computed tomography (CT) with sub-millimeter voxel size. Three volunteers were scanned while lying supine and while standing using a C-arm CT scanner. Using tantalum fiducial markers, patients´ involuntary motion-induced artifacts were corrected in 3D. Point clouds of the femur and tibia in standing and supine reconstructions were automatically segmented. The tibia in standing reconstruction was registered to that in supine reconstruction using a rigid body transformation. Joint space width (JSW) was then compared under weightbearing and non-weightbearing. A pixel-wise JSW was measured as the shortest Euclidean distance between each pixel on the tibial plateau and the femoral condyles. A comparison of joint space parameters (minimum (JSWmin), mean (JSWmean), and volume (JSV)) under weightbearing to non-weightbearing conditions was made. Our results demonstrate that the relative joint space of the medial and lateral compartments between weightbearing and non-weightbearing were different in the three subjects. In general, JSWmin, JSWmean, and JSV decreased as loads were applied. Given an applied load, JSWmin decreased by up to 1.44 mm and 1.34 mm in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively, and specific regions with most narrow JSW were concentrated more locally. The maximum decrease in JSV due to weightbearing was 21.4 % and 14.9 % for the medial and lateral compartments, respectively. In conclusion, a C-arm CT system can be used to provide measurements of 3D joint space under loaded conditions. 2D scanning might lead to inaccurate diagnosis about knee cartilage health.
  • Keywords
    bone; computerised tomography; image reconstruction; image registration; image segmentation; medical image processing; 2D scanning; 3D joint space measurements; C-arm CT scanner; C-arm computed tomography; Euclidean distance; JSV; JSW; femoral condyles; femur; image registration; image segmentation; joint space width; knee cartilage health; knee joint space volume; lying supine; nonweightbearing conditions; patient diagnosis; patient involuntary motion-induced artifacts; pixel-wise JSW; rigid body transformation; sub-millimeter voxel size; supine conditions; supine reconstructions; tantalum fiducial markers; three-dimensional joint space; tibia; tibial plateau; tibiofemoral joint; upright conditions; Bones; Computed tomography; Extraterrestrial measurements; Joints; Osteoarthritis; Three-dimensional displays; Cone-beam CT; joint space width; osteoarthritis; tibiofemoral joint; weightbearing knee;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 2013 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Seoul
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4799-0533-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/NSSMIC.2013.6829040
  • Filename
    6829040