DocumentCode
72157
Title
Greedy Algorithms for Joint Sparse Recovery
Author
Blanchard, Jeffrey D. ; Cermak, Michael ; Hanle, David ; Yirong Jing
Author_Institution
Dept. of Math. & Stat., Grinnell Coll., Grinnell, IA, USA
Volume
62
Issue
7
fYear
2014
fDate
1-Apr-14
Firstpage
1694
Lastpage
1704
Abstract
Five known greedy algorithms designed for the single measurement vector setting in compressed sensing and sparse approximation are extended to the multiple measurement vector scenario: Iterative Hard Thresholding (IHT), Normalized IHT (NIHT), Hard Thresholding Pursuit (HTP), Normalized HTP (NHTP), and Compressive Sampling Matching Pursuit (CoSaMP). Using the asymmetric restricted isometry property (ARIP), sufficient conditions for all five algorithms establish bounds on the discrepancy between the algorithms´ output and the optimal row-sparse representation. When the initial multiple measurement vectors are jointly sparse, ARIP-based guarantees for exact recovery are also established. The algorithms are then compared via the recovery phase transition framework. The strong phase transitions describing the family of Gaussian matrices which satisfy the sufficient conditions are obtained via known bounds on the ARIP constants. The algorithms´ empirical weak phase transitions are compared for various numbers of multiple measurement vectors. Finally, the performance of the algorithms is compared against a known rank aware greedy algorithm, Rank Aware Simultaneous Orthogonal Matching Pursuit + MUSIC. Simultaneous recovery variants of NIHT, NHTP, and CoSaMP all outperform the rank-aware algorithm.
Keywords
approximation theory; compressed sensing; greedy algorithms; iterative methods; matrix algebra; sampling methods; ARIP constants; CoSaMP; Gaussian matrices; NHTP; asymmetric restricted isometry property; compressed sensing; compressive sampling matching pursuit; greedy algorithms; hard thresholding pursuit; iterative hard thresholding; joint sparse recovery; normalized HTP; normalized IHT; optimal row-sparse representation; recovery phase transition framework; single measurement vector setting; sparse approximation; Algorithm design and analysis; Approximation algorithms; Approximation methods; Greedy algorithms; Matching pursuit algorithms; Signal processing algorithms; Vectors; Compressed sensing; greedy algorithms; joint sparsity; multiple measurement vectors; performance comparison; row sparse matrices;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
1053-587X
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TSP.2014.2301980
Filename
6719509
Link To Document