Title :
Forensic voice comparison with monophthongal formant trajectories - a likelihood ratio-based discrimination of “schwa” vowel acoustics in a close social group of young Australian females
Author_Institution :
Australian Nat. Univ., Canberra, ACT, Australia
Abstract :
An experiment is described relating to estimation of strength of evidence in likelihood ratio-based forensic voice comparison. It is asked whether a better performance is obtained from point estimation of formant pattern targets in monophthongal vowel acoustics rather than formant trajectories. The hypothesis is tested on non-contemporaneous recordings of a custom-built challenging database of 26 young Australian female voices performing a map task. Evaluation with the log likelihood ratio cost validity metric Cllr shows that both trajectory and target perform well, but that contrary to phonological predictions, evidence based on monophthongal F-pattern trajectory is superior to target point measurements.
Keywords :
acoustic signal processing; audio databases; audio recording; audio signal processing; estimation theory; forensic science; speech processing; Australian female voices; SCHWA vowel acoustics; formant pattern targets; likelihood ratio-based discrimination; likelihood ratio-based forensic voice comparison; log likelihood ratio cost validity metric; monophthongal F-pattern trajectory; monophthongal formant trajectories; monophthongal vowel acoustic; noncontemporaneous recordings; phonological predictions; point estimation; Cepstral analysis; Forensics; Speaker recognition; Speech; Speech recognition; Trajectory; F-pattern; Forensic voice comparison; female voices; likelihood ratio; similar-sounding speakers;
Conference_Titel :
Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2015 IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location :
South Brisbane, QLD
DOI :
10.1109/ICASSP.2015.7178886