DocumentCode
734146
Title
Is Requirements Engineering Inherently Counterproductive?
Author
Ralph, Paul ; Mohanani, Rahul
Author_Institution
Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
fYear
2015
fDate
17-17 May 2015
Firstpage
20
Lastpage
23
Abstract
This paper explores the possibility that requirements engineering is, in principle, detrimental to software project success. Requirements engineering is conceptually divided into two distinct processes: sense making (learning about the project context) and problem structuring (specifying problems, goals, requirements, constraints, etc.). An interdisciplinary literature review revealed substantial evidence that while sense making improves design performance, problem structuring reduces design performance. Future research should therefore investigate decoupling the sense making aspects of requirements engineering from the problem structuring aspects.
Keywords
formal specification; formal verification; project management; software management; systems analysis; RE; problem structuring; requirements engineering; sense making; software project success; Context; Presses; Problem-solving; Psychology; Requirements engineering; Software; Software engineering; Design; Domain Knowledge; Problem Structuring; Requirements Engineering; Sensemaking;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Twin Peaks of Requirements and Architecture (TwinPeaks), 2015 IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on the
Conference_Location
Florence
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/TwinPeaks.2015.12
Filename
7184708
Link To Document